#TSA #subscapularis-sparing approach #artroplastia total de hombro
Fuente
Este artículo es originalmente publicado en:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25979552
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274615001330
Ding DY1, Mahure SA2, Akuoko JA2, Zuckerman JD3, Kwon YW3.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jun;24(6):831-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.03.009.
Todos los derechos reservados para:
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Traditional total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) involves releasing the subscapularis tendon for exposure. This can potentially lead to subscapularis insufficiency, compromised function, and dissatisfaction. A novel TSA technique preserves the subscapularis tendon by performing the procedure entirely through the rotator interval, allowing accelerated rehabilitation. However, early reports on this approach have noted malpositioning of the humeral component and residual osteophytes. In a randomized trial, we examined the incidence of humeral head malpositioning, incorrect sizing, and residual osteophytes on postoperative radiographs after subscapularis-sparing TSA compared with the traditional approach.
CONCLUSIONS:
Although anatomic restoration of the shoulder can be accomplished using subscapularis-sparing TSA, retained osteophytes and significant mismatch of the HHD raise concerns regarding long-term outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS:
Total shoulder arthroplasty; anatomic reconstruction index; anatomic shoulder; malpositioning; radiographic outcome; rotator interval; subscapularis inefficiency; subscapularis-sparing approach
- PMID: 25979552 [PubMed – in process]
Comentarios recientes